Article
News
3
min read
Brad Bonavida

Weber State Funds Its Entire Decarbonization Program with a $5M Internal Revolving Loan and Has Generated $3.1M in Annual Savings

April 13, 2026

Weber State University set a goal of carbon neutrality in 2007.

Justin Owen, Interim Director of Plant Operations, is responsible for the energy usage at Weber State in Ogden, Utah, a 3-million-square-foot campus with about 28,000 students. When the university decided to pursue its carbon-neutral commitment in earnest, Owen’s team passed on performance-based contracts from ESCOs and low-interest loans and instead borrowed from the university’s own cash management pool. A $5 million internal revolving line of credit. Energy projects generate savings, savings pay down debt, free up capital for more projects, and the cycle compounds. Fifteen years in, the program has produced $3.1 million in annual savings, a 51% reduction in utility costs, 57% of campus electrified, and a credible path to carbon neutral by 2040.

The financial model works because of two rules set by the administrative VP at the outset: savings must be documented, and savings must be real. Owen doesn’t weather normalize his reported savings, a deliberate choice grounded in how his CFO thinks. The university’s utility budget is calculated at $2 per square foot across 3 million square feet, totaling $6 million annually. This budget allows the energy and accounting teams to maintain credibility with one another. If Justin’s team believes they’ve saved $3M in energy, the $6M utility budget account better have $3M in it at the end of the year.

The program’s success relies on the bridge between financial communication and engineering communication. Owen’s point is that energy engineers who can’t translate their work into accounting terms will lose their CFOs. Weather normalization makes engineering sense, but the CFO doesn’t think in weather-normalized dollars. Owen instead negotiated a risk-sharing arrangement: the energy program absorbs the cost of weather variability and changes in space use. At the same time, the administration has agreed to adjust the utility budget upward as electricity and gas rates rise and the campus grows. Both sides of that bargain are easy to measure and document objectively, which is what makes the arrangement durable.

The savings compound in a way that makes the math increasingly attractive over time. A lighting retrofit from 2012 is still generating savings today. Owen augments capital improvement dollars the university would be spending anyway, redirecting energy program funds toward higher-impact investments. When a chiller reaches the end of its life, the program steps in and installs a ground-source field there instead. The $1.7 million solar array beside Lindquist Hall was funded entirely from energy savings. A 10 MWh battery storage system is currently under construction and is also funded by energy savings.

Owen’s advice to energy managers at other institutions: the program only works if the administration trusts the numbers. Building that trust means learning to speak the CFO’s language before asking for the first dollar.

‍

Watch the full recording.

Register for the next Nexus Labs event.

Sign up for the newsletter to get 5 stories like this per week:

Sign Up for Access or Log In to Continue Viewing

Sign Up for Access or Log In to Continue Viewing

Weber State University set a goal of carbon neutrality in 2007.

Justin Owen, Interim Director of Plant Operations, is responsible for the energy usage at Weber State in Ogden, Utah, a 3-million-square-foot campus with about 28,000 students. When the university decided to pursue its carbon-neutral commitment in earnest, Owen’s team passed on performance-based contracts from ESCOs and low-interest loans and instead borrowed from the university’s own cash management pool. A $5 million internal revolving line of credit. Energy projects generate savings, savings pay down debt, free up capital for more projects, and the cycle compounds. Fifteen years in, the program has produced $3.1 million in annual savings, a 51% reduction in utility costs, 57% of campus electrified, and a credible path to carbon neutral by 2040.

The financial model works because of two rules set by the administrative VP at the outset: savings must be documented, and savings must be real. Owen doesn’t weather normalize his reported savings, a deliberate choice grounded in how his CFO thinks. The university’s utility budget is calculated at $2 per square foot across 3 million square feet, totaling $6 million annually. This budget allows the energy and accounting teams to maintain credibility with one another. If Justin’s team believes they’ve saved $3M in energy, the $6M utility budget account better have $3M in it at the end of the year.

The program’s success relies on the bridge between financial communication and engineering communication. Owen’s point is that energy engineers who can’t translate their work into accounting terms will lose their CFOs. Weather normalization makes engineering sense, but the CFO doesn’t think in weather-normalized dollars. Owen instead negotiated a risk-sharing arrangement: the energy program absorbs the cost of weather variability and changes in space use. At the same time, the administration has agreed to adjust the utility budget upward as electricity and gas rates rise and the campus grows. Both sides of that bargain are easy to measure and document objectively, which is what makes the arrangement durable.

The savings compound in a way that makes the math increasingly attractive over time. A lighting retrofit from 2012 is still generating savings today. Owen augments capital improvement dollars the university would be spending anyway, redirecting energy program funds toward higher-impact investments. When a chiller reaches the end of its life, the program steps in and installs a ground-source field there instead. The $1.7 million solar array beside Lindquist Hall was funded entirely from energy savings. A 10 MWh battery storage system is currently under construction and is also funded by energy savings.

Owen’s advice to energy managers at other institutions: the program only works if the administration trusts the numbers. Building that trust means learning to speak the CFO’s language before asking for the first dollar.

‍

Watch the full recording.

Register for the next Nexus Labs event.

Sign up for the newsletter to get 5 stories like this per week:

⭐️ Pro Article

Sign Up for Access or Log In to View

⭐️ Pro Article

Sign Up for Access or Log In to View

Are you interested in joining us at NexusCon 2026? Register now so you don’t miss out!

Join Today

Are you a Nexus Pro member yet? Join now to get access to our community of 600+ members.

Join Today

Have you taken our Smart Building Strategist Course yet? Sign up to get access to our courses platform.

Enroll Now
Conversation
Comments (-)
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Guest
•
6 hours ago
Delete

This is a great piece!

REPLYCANCEL
or register to comment as a member
POST REPLY
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Guest
•
6 hours ago
Delete

I agree.

REPLYCANCEL
or register to comment as a member
POST REPLY
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Get the renowned Nexus Newsletter

Access the Nexus Community

Head over to Nexus Connect and see what’s new in the community. Don’t forget to check out the latest member-only events.

Go to Nexus Connect

Upgrade to Nexus Pro

Join Nexus Pro and get full access including invite-only member gatherings, access to the community chatroom Nexus Connect, networking opportunities, and deep dive essays.

Sign Up