Article
News
2
min read
James Dice

A particle counter gave Intuitive Surgical the evidence it needed to rethink cleanroom ventilation

January 12, 2026

Intuitive Surgical didn’t change its cleanroom ventilation strategy because energy models said it should. It changed course because it finally had data that its manufacturing and EHS teams were willing to trust.

The company operates Class A cleanroom environments used to manufacture surgical instruments that go inside the human body. Those spaces were running high air-change rates around the clock—despite the fact that particle counts were only measured quarterly.

We only monitor the particle count on a quarterly basis,” said Brian Larson, who leads facilities and energy work at Intuitive Surgical. “So we are changing the air out a significant amount of times and using a lot of energy to do so.

The barrier wasn’t awareness—it was risk. Cleanroom downtime can cost “millions of dollars along the line every single hour,” according to Intuitive’s energy partner Tom Arnold of Gridium. Without evidence of safety, even discussing HVAC setbacks was off the table.

That changed when a mechanical engineering intern secured funding and installed a continuous particle counter.

Nobody in the organization ever had this data,” Arnold said.

The results were hard to ignore. Weekend particle counts were “basically nothing,” showing the rooms were far cleaner than required when unoccupied. The data also made disruption visible—janitorial activity showed up immediately as particle spikes.

That case for setback is actually pretty strong now,” Arnold said.

Instead of arguing for blanket changes, the team could point to specific conditions and time periods where ventilation could safely be reduced. Larson emphasized this wasn’t about human comfort, as these energy projects typically are. “This is manufacturing,” he said. “You have EHS, manufacturing executives, and huge risk exposure.

The project is still early, but the decision-making constraint has shifted—from fear of unknown risk to evidence-backed tradeoffs.  

If you’d like to learn more, here are some ways to stay updated on stories like this:

Sign Up for Access or Log In to Continue Viewing

Sign Up for Access or Log In to Continue Viewing

Intuitive Surgical didn’t change its cleanroom ventilation strategy because energy models said it should. It changed course because it finally had data that its manufacturing and EHS teams were willing to trust.

The company operates Class A cleanroom environments used to manufacture surgical instruments that go inside the human body. Those spaces were running high air-change rates around the clock—despite the fact that particle counts were only measured quarterly.

We only monitor the particle count on a quarterly basis,” said Brian Larson, who leads facilities and energy work at Intuitive Surgical. “So we are changing the air out a significant amount of times and using a lot of energy to do so.

The barrier wasn’t awareness—it was risk. Cleanroom downtime can cost “millions of dollars along the line every single hour,” according to Intuitive’s energy partner Tom Arnold of Gridium. Without evidence of safety, even discussing HVAC setbacks was off the table.

That changed when a mechanical engineering intern secured funding and installed a continuous particle counter.

Nobody in the organization ever had this data,” Arnold said.

The results were hard to ignore. Weekend particle counts were “basically nothing,” showing the rooms were far cleaner than required when unoccupied. The data also made disruption visible—janitorial activity showed up immediately as particle spikes.

That case for setback is actually pretty strong now,” Arnold said.

Instead of arguing for blanket changes, the team could point to specific conditions and time periods where ventilation could safely be reduced. Larson emphasized this wasn’t about human comfort, as these energy projects typically are. “This is manufacturing,” he said. “You have EHS, manufacturing executives, and huge risk exposure.

The project is still early, but the decision-making constraint has shifted—from fear of unknown risk to evidence-backed tradeoffs.  

If you’d like to learn more, here are some ways to stay updated on stories like this:

⭐️ Pro Article

Sign Up for Access or Log In to View

⭐️ Pro Article

Sign Up for Access or Log In to View

Are you interested in joining us at NexusCon 2026? Register now so you don’t miss out!

Join Today

Are you a Nexus Pro member yet? Join now to get access to our community of 600+ members.

Join Today

Have you taken our Smart Building Strategist Course yet? Sign up to get access to our courses platform.

Enroll Now
Conversation
Comments (-)
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Guest
6 hours ago
Delete

This is a great piece!

REPLYCANCEL
or register to comment as a member
POST REPLY
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Guest
6 hours ago
Delete

I agree.

REPLYCANCEL
or register to comment as a member
POST REPLY
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Get the renowned Nexus Newsletter

Access the Nexus Community

Head over to Nexus Connect and see what’s new in the community. Don’t forget to check out the latest member-only events.

Go to Nexus Connect

Upgrade to Nexus Pro

Join Nexus Pro and get full access including invite-only member gatherings, access to the community chatroom Nexus Connect, networking opportunities, and deep dive essays.

Sign Up