đ Welcome to Nexus, a newsletter for people applying analytics and other smart building technologyâwritten by James Dice.
If youâve been forwarded this email, you can sign up for your subscription here:
This is an experiment, and Iâd love your feedback. If you have thoughts, questions, ideas or tips, join the discussion on LinkedIn or hit reply.
+ Why building analytics are inevitableâmy response to a recent discussion questioning whether analytics will go mainstream. Iâve also tried something new with this post: adding your ideas from LinkedIn into the essay. Thanks to Drew DePriest, Terry Herr, Nick Gayewski, Ed Buckley, Joel Urban, and Derek Cowburn for lending their wisdom.
+ The latest LinkedIn discussion:
Who owns the data?
Smart building vendors can claim the data they collect is owned by the owner of the buildingâbut when you look under the hood thatâs not always true.
If the vendor makes it nearly impossible for the owner to use the data without first going through the vendor, then doesnât the vendor own it?
This thread has some great discussion and insights from our community.
What are your keys to ensuring data access and ownership?
+ Stop Calling Your Building Smart, Prove It (Propmodo)
Like many words that seem to spring up out of nowhere to become a shared piece of the lexicon, smart building is a term that we all understand on a superficial level. We use it without hesitation and nod in understanding when it gets used, assuming that the other party in the communication must have a full grasp on what it means. But that is the problem: we donât agree on its meaning.
This article is a great intro to the forthcoming Intelligent Buildings Index and to smart building scorecards in general. We have a gap in our industry: thereâs no roadmap to the promised land, so how can we expect owners to start their journey?
Until we can make it easier for all parties to understand the links between the required enablers and real outcomes of building intelligence, then investment, planning and innovation processes will remain rudderless.
Aside from the IB Index, which doesnât exist yet but is supposedly coming soon, Iâve recently seen two other attempts at assigning intelligence scores to buildings:
Now, readers, Iâm asking you:
What other smart building scoring systems are out there? Hit reply and let me know.
+ Comfyâs Guide to Occupancy Sensors for the Modern WorkplaceâIâve mostly specified occupancy sensors as an energy-saving device. This article is a great intro to enhancing the office employeeâs experience and to better informing workplace decisions using occupancy sensors.
Similar to our recent discussion on KPIs in Nexus #10, itâs no longer enough to specify building technology with one single, siloed purpose. We must consider the ownerâs overall goals for the facility firstâeverything else plays a supporting role.
P.S. Although Iâm not a marketer, I think this piece should be an example for marketers in our space. Comfyâs app is mentioned several times, but itâs not the focus. The focus is on educating the reader. How novel!
+ Miraculous or Mundane on the Next Story Up podcastâThe above use case for occupancy sensors is an example of a monetizable impact of smart building technology. This episode on the Next Story Up podcast insightfully outlines four major  monetizable impacts that cut across different building type verticals:
This means that for each solution, we should consider how it impacts each category. Letâs return to occupancy sensors. A simple occupancy sensor could be monetized in so many ways:
How does your technology affect these four areas of monetizable value?
OK, thatâs all for this weekâthanks for reading Nexus!
If you have thoughts on this weekâs edition, head on over to LinkedIn:
đ Welcome to Nexus, a newsletter for people applying analytics and other smart building technologyâwritten by James Dice.
If youâve been forwarded this email, you can sign up for your subscription here:
This is an experiment, and Iâd love your feedback. If you have thoughts, questions, ideas or tips, join the discussion on LinkedIn or hit reply.
+ Why building analytics are inevitableâmy response to a recent discussion questioning whether analytics will go mainstream. Iâve also tried something new with this post: adding your ideas from LinkedIn into the essay. Thanks to Drew DePriest, Terry Herr, Nick Gayewski, Ed Buckley, Joel Urban, and Derek Cowburn for lending their wisdom.
+ The latest LinkedIn discussion:
Who owns the data?
Smart building vendors can claim the data they collect is owned by the owner of the buildingâbut when you look under the hood thatâs not always true.
If the vendor makes it nearly impossible for the owner to use the data without first going through the vendor, then doesnât the vendor own it?
This thread has some great discussion and insights from our community.
What are your keys to ensuring data access and ownership?
+ Stop Calling Your Building Smart, Prove It (Propmodo)
Like many words that seem to spring up out of nowhere to become a shared piece of the lexicon, smart building is a term that we all understand on a superficial level. We use it without hesitation and nod in understanding when it gets used, assuming that the other party in the communication must have a full grasp on what it means. But that is the problem: we donât agree on its meaning.
This article is a great intro to the forthcoming Intelligent Buildings Index and to smart building scorecards in general. We have a gap in our industry: thereâs no roadmap to the promised land, so how can we expect owners to start their journey?
Until we can make it easier for all parties to understand the links between the required enablers and real outcomes of building intelligence, then investment, planning and innovation processes will remain rudderless.
Aside from the IB Index, which doesnât exist yet but is supposedly coming soon, Iâve recently seen two other attempts at assigning intelligence scores to buildings:
Now, readers, Iâm asking you:
What other smart building scoring systems are out there? Hit reply and let me know.
+ Comfyâs Guide to Occupancy Sensors for the Modern WorkplaceâIâve mostly specified occupancy sensors as an energy-saving device. This article is a great intro to enhancing the office employeeâs experience and to better informing workplace decisions using occupancy sensors.
Similar to our recent discussion on KPIs in Nexus #10, itâs no longer enough to specify building technology with one single, siloed purpose. We must consider the ownerâs overall goals for the facility firstâeverything else plays a supporting role.
P.S. Although Iâm not a marketer, I think this piece should be an example for marketers in our space. Comfyâs app is mentioned several times, but itâs not the focus. The focus is on educating the reader. How novel!
+ Miraculous or Mundane on the Next Story Up podcastâThe above use case for occupancy sensors is an example of a monetizable impact of smart building technology. This episode on the Next Story Up podcast insightfully outlines four major  monetizable impacts that cut across different building type verticals:
This means that for each solution, we should consider how it impacts each category. Letâs return to occupancy sensors. A simple occupancy sensor could be monetized in so many ways:
How does your technology affect these four areas of monetizable value?
OK, thatâs all for this weekâthanks for reading Nexus!
If you have thoughts on this weekâs edition, head on over to LinkedIn:
Head over to Nexus Connect and see whatâs new in the community. Donât forget to check out the latest member-only events.
Go to Nexus ConnectJoin Nexus Pro and get full access including invite-only member gatherings, access to the community chatroom Nexus Connect, networking opportunities, and deep dive essays.
Sign Up